519 lines
18 KiB
Markdown
519 lines
18 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
name: mckinsey-style-visualization
|
||
description: >
|
||
Professional consulting-style data visualization and infographics creation skill for strategic
|
||
analysis and executive presentations. Create high-density, boardroom-ready visualizations in
|
||
McKinsey/BCG style with institutional authority and editorial financial-report aesthetics.
|
||
Covers 11 visualization types (including cover slides), detailed color palettes with hex codes,
|
||
aspect ratio standards, prompt engineering templates, and strategic framing guidance for
|
||
insight-driven deliverables.
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# McKinsey/BCG Style Visualization
|
||
|
||
**Professional consulting-style data visualization and infographics creation skill for strategic analysis and executive presentations.**
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Overview
|
||
|
||
This skill enables the creation of high-density, professional consulting presentation slides and data visualizations in the style of top-tier strategy firms (McKinsey, BCG, Bain). The output combines institutional authority with editorial financial-report aesthetics, designed for boardroom-ready executive presentations.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## When to Use This Skill
|
||
|
||
Use this skill when:
|
||
- Creating strategic analysis presentations for executive audiences
|
||
- Developing competitive benchmarking visualizations
|
||
- Building data-driven consulting deliverables
|
||
- Designing market analysis infographics
|
||
- Producing high-information-density business reports
|
||
- Visualizing complex strategic frameworks and comparisons
|
||
|
||
**Do NOT use for:**
|
||
- Marketing materials or promotional content
|
||
- Startup pitch decks with bright colors
|
||
- Decorative or artistic visualizations
|
||
- Low-information-density slides
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Core Design Principles
|
||
|
||
### 1. Strategic Framing (Mandatory)
|
||
|
||
Every visualization must be **hypothesis-driven, not descriptive**.
|
||
|
||
**Requirements:**
|
||
- State a clear, insight-led headline that answers a strategic question directly
|
||
- Every section must drive toward a specific strategic implication
|
||
- Avoid neutral comparison — highlight structural trade-offs, capability gaps, competitive moats, and strategic asymmetries
|
||
- The visualization should implicitly support an executive-level decision (e.g., invest, partner, build, acquire, differentiate)
|
||
|
||
**Bad Example:** "Comparison of AI Video Models"
|
||
**Good Example:** "Temporal Consistency Emerges as the Key Differentiator in GenAI Video — Seedance 2.0 Leads on Technical Benchmarks but Lags on Ecosystem Integration"
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### 2. Visual & Design Standards
|
||
|
||
#### Aesthetic
|
||
- **Tech-minimalist but information-heavy**
|
||
- Clean, sharp, authoritative
|
||
- Institutional and boardroom-ready
|
||
- **NOT** startup-style or decorative
|
||
|
||
#### Typography
|
||
|
||
**For Cover Slides:**
|
||
- **Main Title:** Serif font (Times New Roman / Georgia / Playfair Display / Libre Baskerville)
|
||
- Size: Very large (48-72pt equivalent)
|
||
- Weight: Regular or Medium (not bold - maintains elegance)
|
||
- Color: White `#FFFFFF`
|
||
- **Subtitle:** Sans-serif (Inter / Helvetica / Arial)
|
||
- Size: Medium (18-24pt equivalent)
|
||
- Weight: Light or Regular
|
||
- Color: Light Grey `#E5E7EB`
|
||
- **Metadata:** Sans-serif (Inter / Helvetica / Arial)
|
||
- Size: Small (10-12pt equivalent)
|
||
- Weight: Light
|
||
- Color: Light Grey `#E5E7EB`
|
||
|
||
**For Content Slides:**
|
||
- **Headlines:** Serif (Times New Roman / Georgia)
|
||
- Size: Large (24-36pt equivalent)
|
||
- Weight: Bold
|
||
- Color: Black `#000000`
|
||
- **Body Text:** Sans-serif (Inter / Helvetica / Arial)
|
||
- Size: Medium (14-16pt equivalent)
|
||
- Weight: Regular
|
||
- Color: Dark Grey `#374151`
|
||
- **Data Labels:** Sans-serif (Inter / Helvetica / Arial / Roboto)
|
||
- Size: Small-Medium (12-14pt equivalent)
|
||
- Weight: Medium or Semibold
|
||
- Color: Black `#000000` or Deep Royal Blue `#1E3A8A`
|
||
- **Emphasis:** Bold for key numbers and strategic insights
|
||
|
||
#### Color Palette
|
||
|
||
**For Content Slides (Data Visualizations):**
|
||
- **Background:** Pure White `#FFFFFF`
|
||
- **Primary Text:** Sharp Black `#000000`
|
||
- **Primary Accent:** Deep Royal Blue `#1E3A8A`
|
||
- **Secondary Accent:** Medium Blue `#2563EB`
|
||
- **Grey Hierarchy:**
|
||
- Dark Grey (primary text): `#374151`
|
||
- Medium Grey (secondary text): `#6B7280`
|
||
- Light Grey (borders/dividers): `#D1D5DB`
|
||
- Very Light Grey (subtle backgrounds): `#F3F4F6`
|
||
|
||
**For Cover Slides:**
|
||
- **Background:** Deep Navy Blue `#1E3A5F`
|
||
- **Alternative Background:** Gradient from `#1E3A5F` to `#2C4A6F`
|
||
- **Primary Text:** Pure White `#FFFFFF`
|
||
- **Secondary Text:** Light Grey `#E5E7EB`
|
||
- **Optional Accent:** Subtle Gold `#D4AF37` (for premium touch, use sparingly)
|
||
|
||
**General Rules:**
|
||
- **NO gradients** on content slides (only subtle gradients allowed on cover slides)
|
||
- **NO bright startup colors** (avoid neon, pastels, or vibrant hues)
|
||
|
||
#### Graphic Rules
|
||
- **Hairline borders** for tables (thin, precise lines)
|
||
- **Precise vector lines** for charts and frameworks
|
||
- **NO decorative icons** (use functional icons only when necessary)
|
||
- **NO visual clutter** (every element must serve a purpose)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### 3. Aspect Ratio Standards
|
||
|
||
**CRITICAL: Always use landscape (horizontal) orientation for consistency.**
|
||
|
||
**Recommended aspect ratios:**
|
||
- **Landscape (16:9):** Default for all visualizations — ensures consistency across slides
|
||
- **Landscape (3:2):** Alternative for wider layouts
|
||
|
||
**Avoid:**
|
||
- Portrait orientation (unless specifically requested)
|
||
- Square formats (unless for specific use cases like social media)
|
||
|
||
**Rationale:**
|
||
- Landscape orientation is standard for business presentations
|
||
- Maintains visual consistency when multiple charts are used together
|
||
- Optimized for screen sharing and projection
|
||
- Easier to read in document formats
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Visualization Types & Use Cases
|
||
|
||
### Type 1: Time-Series Growth Charts
|
||
|
||
**Use when:** Showing adoption rates, market growth, performance over time
|
||
|
||
**Elements:**
|
||
- Line chart or bar chart with clear time axis
|
||
- Large percentage numbers above data points
|
||
- Annotation box for key insights (e.g., "2x growth in 2 years")
|
||
- Clean gridlines every 10-20%
|
||
- Upward arrow for positive trends
|
||
|
||
**Example:** AI adoption rate from 38% (2023) to 72% (2025)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Type 2: Gap/Funnel Visualizations
|
||
|
||
**Use when:** Highlighting dramatic differences, maturity gaps, conversion funnels
|
||
|
||
**Elements:**
|
||
- Horizontal bars or funnel shape
|
||
- Extreme contrast in bar lengths to emphasize gap
|
||
- Large percentage labels
|
||
- Annotation explaining the implication (e.g., "Only 1 in 90 organizations...")
|
||
|
||
**Example:** 90% using AI vs. 1% with mature operations
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Type 3: Before/After Comparisons
|
||
|
||
**Use when:** Demonstrating impact, ROI, performance improvement
|
||
|
||
**Elements:**
|
||
- Two vertical bars side by side
|
||
- Different colors (grey for "before", royal blue for "after")
|
||
- Curved arrow with improvement metric (e.g., "+28.8 points")
|
||
- Y-axis with clear scale
|
||
- Annotation box for context (e.g., "RCT study in Pakistan")
|
||
|
||
**Example:** Diagnostic accuracy 50% → 78.8% after 20-hour training
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Type 4: Market Share / Adoption Rate
|
||
|
||
**Use when:** Showing percentage breakdowns, market penetration
|
||
|
||
**Elements:**
|
||
- Donut chart with center percentage
|
||
- Left side: chart; Right side: key statistics in large text
|
||
- Two-color scheme (primary + grey)
|
||
- Legend with color-coded boxes
|
||
|
||
**Example:** 77% of US medical schools adopted AI curriculum
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Type 5: Investment / Scale Infographics
|
||
|
||
**Use when:** Comparing organizational investments, scale of operations
|
||
|
||
**Elements:**
|
||
- Horizontal layout with vertical divider
|
||
- Left section: Organization A with icon, large numbers, context
|
||
- Right section: Organization B with icon, large numbers, context
|
||
- Clean vector icons in royal blue
|
||
- Hairline divider between sections
|
||
|
||
**Example:** Kaiser Permanente (40 hospitals, 600+ facilities) vs. Mayo Clinic ($1B, 200+ projects)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Type 6: Timeline Visualizations
|
||
|
||
**Use when:** Showing chronological events, policy changes, milestones
|
||
|
||
**Elements:**
|
||
- Horizontal timeline with circular nodes
|
||
- Icons above each milestone
|
||
- Event labels above line, dates below line
|
||
- Connecting line in royal blue
|
||
- Clean sans-serif labels
|
||
|
||
**Example:** 2025 medical education AI integration (July AAMC → Fall Stanford → November AMA)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Type 7: Comparison / Contrast Diagrams
|
||
|
||
**Use when:** Highlighting differences between regions, organizations, or strategies
|
||
|
||
**Elements:**
|
||
- Split design with vertical divider
|
||
- Left side: data-rich with bullet points and icons
|
||
- Right side: sparse or question marks to emphasize gap
|
||
- High contrast between sections
|
||
- Clear header labels
|
||
|
||
**Example:** US/Global Leaders (72%, 77%, $1B+) vs. Japan (status unclear, unknown data)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Type 8: Strategic Frameworks
|
||
|
||
**Use when:** Positioning analysis, capability assessment, competitive mapping
|
||
|
||
**Elements:**
|
||
- 2×2 matrix with clearly labeled axes
|
||
- Positioning markers for each player
|
||
- Thin vector lines for grid
|
||
- Quadrant labels explaining strategic implications
|
||
|
||
**Example:** Market Share (x-axis) vs. Technical Capability (y-axis)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Type 9: Competitive Benchmarking Tables
|
||
|
||
**Use when:** Detailed multi-dimensional comparison across players
|
||
|
||
**Elements:**
|
||
- Multi-row, multi-column table
|
||
- Quantified metrics (numbers, percentages, scores)
|
||
- Clear ranking or benchmarking logic
|
||
- Hairline borders
|
||
- Numeric alignment and hierarchy
|
||
- Visual indicators for leaders/laggards (e.g., color coding)
|
||
|
||
**Example:** Comparison of GenAI video models across architecture, consistency, prompt adherence
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Type 10: Waterfall Charts
|
||
|
||
**Use when:** Showing cumulative effect, step-by-step changes, variance analysis
|
||
|
||
**Elements:**
|
||
- Horizontal bars showing incremental changes
|
||
- Starting value → intermediate steps → ending value
|
||
- Color coding for positive (blue) and negative (grey/red) changes
|
||
- Connecting lines between bars
|
||
- Clear labels for each step
|
||
|
||
**Example:** Revenue bridge from Q1 to Q4 showing growth drivers
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Type 11: Cover Slide
|
||
|
||
**Use when:** Creating the opening slide for a consulting presentation
|
||
|
||
**Elements:**
|
||
- Deep navy blue background (solid `#1E3A5F` or subtle gradient from `#1E3A5F` to `#2C4A6F`)
|
||
- Large serif font title in white (centered or left-aligned)
|
||
- Subtitle in smaller sans-serif font
|
||
- Optional metadata (date, author, organization) in small text at bottom
|
||
- Optional subtle gold accent (`#D4AF37`) for premium touch
|
||
- Minimal or no graphics — focus on typography
|
||
|
||
**Example:** "The Future of AI in Healthcare: Strategic Implications for 2026"
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Prompt Engineering Templates
|
||
|
||
When generating visualizations using image generation tools, use these templates:
|
||
|
||
### Template 1: Time-Series Growth Chart
|
||
```
|
||
Create a professional consulting-style time-series growth chart in landscape 16:9 format.
|
||
White background, black text, royal blue (#1E3A8A) line chart.
|
||
Serif headline in bold: "[Your Insight-Driven Headline]"
|
||
X-axis: [Time periods], Y-axis: [Metric with gridlines every 10-20%]
|
||
Large percentage labels above data points: [Data points]
|
||
Annotation box in top right: "[Key insight, e.g., '2x growth in 2 years']"
|
||
Clean, minimal, institutional aesthetic. No gradients, no decorative elements.
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Template 2: Gap/Funnel Visualization
|
||
```
|
||
Create a professional consulting-style gap visualization in landscape 16:9 format.
|
||
White background, black text. Serif headline in bold: "[Your Insight-Driven Headline]"
|
||
Two horizontal bars:
|
||
- Top bar (royal blue #1E3A8A): [X%] - [Label]
|
||
- Bottom bar (light grey #D1D5DB): [Y%] - [Label]
|
||
Extreme contrast in bar lengths to emphasize gap.
|
||
Large percentage labels on right side of each bar.
|
||
Annotation below: "[Strategic implication]"
|
||
Clean, minimal, institutional aesthetic. No gradients, no decorative elements.
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Template 3: Before/After Comparison
|
||
```
|
||
Create a professional consulting-style before/after comparison chart in landscape 16:9 format.
|
||
White background, black text. Serif headline in bold: "[Your Insight-Driven Headline]"
|
||
Two vertical bars side by side:
|
||
- Left bar (grey #6B7280): [Before value] - labeled "Before"
|
||
- Right bar (royal blue #1E3A8A): [After value] - labeled "After"
|
||
Curved arrow between bars with improvement metric: "+[X] points"
|
||
Y-axis with clear scale from 0 to [max value]
|
||
Annotation box: "[Context, e.g., 'RCT study in Pakistan']"
|
||
Clean, minimal, institutional aesthetic. No gradients, no decorative elements.
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Template 4: Cover Slide
|
||
```
|
||
Create a professional consulting-style cover slide in landscape 16:9 format.
|
||
Deep navy blue background (#1E3A5F) with subtle gradient to (#2C4A6F).
|
||
Large serif font title in white (#FFFFFF), centered or left-aligned: "[Your Title]"
|
||
Subtitle in smaller sans-serif font, light grey (#E5E7EB): "[Your Subtitle]"
|
||
Optional metadata at bottom in small text: "[Date | Author | Organization]"
|
||
Optional subtle gold accent (#D4AF37) for premium touch (use sparingly).
|
||
Minimal or no graphics — focus on elegant typography.
|
||
Clean, institutional, boardroom-ready aesthetic.
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**General prompt engineering tips:**
|
||
- Always specify "landscape 16:9 format" at the beginning
|
||
- Always specify "white background" for content slides, "deep navy blue background" for cover slides
|
||
- Always specify "serif headline in bold" for content slides
|
||
- Always include exact hex codes for colors
|
||
- Always emphasize "clean, minimal, institutional aesthetic"
|
||
- Always add "No gradients, no decorative elements" at the end for content slides
|
||
- Use specific data points and labels from your analysis
|
||
- Include strategic insight in the headline
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Workflow
|
||
|
||
1. **Define the strategic question** — What decision does this visualization support?
|
||
2. **Choose the visualization type** — Select from the 11 types above
|
||
3. **Draft the insight-driven headline** — Make it hypothesis-driven, not descriptive
|
||
4. **Gather and structure data** — Organize data points, labels, and annotations
|
||
5. **Select the prompt template** — Use the appropriate template from above
|
||
6. **Customize the prompt** — Fill in your specific data, headline, and insights
|
||
7. **Generate the visualization** — Use image generation tools with the customized prompt
|
||
8. **Review and refine** — Check against the quality checklist below
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Language Considerations
|
||
|
||
**Default language: English**
|
||
|
||
While this skill can be used in Japanese or other languages, **English is strongly recommended** for the following reasons:
|
||
|
||
1. **Font rendering:** Image generation models handle English typography more reliably
|
||
2. **Consistency:** Serif/sans-serif font pairing works better in English
|
||
3. **Readability:** Latin characters render more clearly at small sizes
|
||
4. **International audience:** English is standard for global business presentations
|
||
|
||
**If Japanese is required:**
|
||
- Use sans-serif fonts only (avoid serif for Japanese text)
|
||
- Increase font sizes for better readability
|
||
- Test rendering quality before finalizing
|
||
- Be prepared for potential issues:
|
||
- Font substitution
|
||
- Character spacing problems
|
||
- Inconsistent font rendering
|
||
|
||
**Best practice:** Use English for all text in visualizations, then provide Japanese translations in accompanying documents if needed.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Multi-Visualization Projects
|
||
|
||
When creating multiple visualizations for a single project:
|
||
|
||
1. **Maintain consistent aspect ratio** — Use landscape for all charts
|
||
2. **Use the same color palette** — Deep royal blue, greys, white, black
|
||
3. **Apply consistent typography** — Serif for headlines, sans-serif for data
|
||
4. **Align visual density** — Similar level of information across all charts
|
||
5. **Create a visual hierarchy** — Most important insights first
|
||
|
||
**Batch generation:**
|
||
- Generate up to 5 images per batch using image generation tools
|
||
- Ensure all images in a batch use the same aspect ratio
|
||
- Review all images for consistency before delivering
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Quality Checklist
|
||
|
||
Before delivering any visualization, verify:
|
||
|
||
- [ ] **Aspect ratio:** Landscape orientation used
|
||
- [ ] **Color palette:** White background, black text, royal blue accents, no gradients (for content slides)
|
||
- [ ] **Typography:** Serif headline, sans-serif data labels
|
||
- [ ] **Data accuracy:** All numbers, percentages, and labels are correct
|
||
- [ ] **Strategic insight:** Headline is insight-driven, not descriptive
|
||
- [ ] **Visual clarity:** No clutter, every element serves a purpose
|
||
- [ ] **Annotations:** Key insights and context provided
|
||
- [ ] **Consistency:** If multiple charts, all follow same design system
|
||
- [ ] **Language:** English used to avoid rendering issues (unless Japanese explicitly requested)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Common Pitfalls to Avoid
|
||
|
||
❌ **Decorative over functional** — Every element must serve a strategic purpose
|
||
❌ **Bright, startup-style colors** — Stick to institutional blue, grey, black, white
|
||
❌ **Portrait orientation** — Always use landscape for consistency
|
||
❌ **Descriptive headlines** — Use insight-driven, strategic headlines
|
||
❌ **Low information density** — Pack in data while maintaining clarity
|
||
❌ **Marketing language** — Use analytical, objective tone
|
||
❌ **Inconsistent design** — Maintain visual consistency across all charts
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Example Use Cases
|
||
|
||
### Use Case 1: Market Analysis
|
||
**Scenario:** Analyze GenAI video model market
|
||
**Visualizations needed:**
|
||
- Competitive benchmarking table (architecture, consistency, prompt adherence)
|
||
- 2×2 positioning matrix (technical capability vs. market share)
|
||
- Timeline of product launches
|
||
- Investment comparison infographic
|
||
|
||
### Use Case 2: Performance Reporting
|
||
**Scenario:** Show quarterly business performance
|
||
**Visualizations needed:**
|
||
- Waterfall chart (revenue bridge)
|
||
- Before/after comparison (KPI improvements)
|
||
- Time-series growth chart (adoption metrics)
|
||
- Gap visualization (target vs. actual)
|
||
|
||
### Use Case 3: Strategic Recommendation
|
||
**Scenario:** Support investment decision
|
||
**Visualizations needed:**
|
||
- Comparison diagram (option A vs. option B)
|
||
- Strategic framework (capability assessment)
|
||
- Investment scale infographic
|
||
- Timeline of implementation milestones
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Integration with Other Skills
|
||
|
||
This skill works well with:
|
||
- **design-sensei:** For additional design principles and accessibility
|
||
- **paper-presentation-slides:** For academic presentation context
|
||
- **paper-article-generator:** For article-embedded visualizations
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Version History
|
||
|
||
- **v1.1** (2026-02-11): Added Type 11 Cover Slide, detailed color palette with hex codes, enhanced typography specifications, and cover slide prompt templates
|
||
- **v1.0** (2026-02-11): Initial skill creation with comprehensive visualization types, aspect ratio standards, and prompt engineering templates
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## References
|
||
|
||
- McKinsey & Company presentation style guidelines
|
||
- BCG visual identity and data visualization standards
|
||
- Financial Times editorial design principles
|
||
- Harvard Business Review chart design best practices
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
**Skill Author:** KEN
|
||
**Last Updated:** 2026-02-11
|
||
**Skill Type:** Visualization & Design
|